Spain: Archaeology Similar Teeth Don't Make Family: Denisovians Are More Distant Cousins After All
A study conducted by the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (Cenieh) refutes the similarities between the teeth of modern Asians and the Denisovans.
Burgos/Spain — The journal PNAS has recently published an article with participation by the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (Cenieh) which denies the similarities between the teeth of modern Asians and the Denisovans, an extinct human population that coexisted with Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals. Their DNA is present in 4-6 % of the current populations of Australia, Melanesia and Papua New Guinea.
The difficulty of studying these hominins lies in the fact that, despite the abundance of DNA obtained, very few fossils have been found that permit reconstruction of their physical appearance. Until now, the fossil record for this group consisted of two teeth and the minuscule bone of a hand found in the Denisova Cave, in Siberia, where the name comes from.
Halfway through this year, the discovery was made of a mandible in Tibet, the Xiahe mandible, that scientists recognised as Denisovan thanks to the analysis of its paleoproteomics, thus becoming the first Denisovan found beyond Denisova. Recently, a study in the journal PNAS led by Shara Bailey of New York University and with the participation of Max Planck from Leipzig (Germany), drew attention to the identification in the Xiahe mandible of a second lower molar with three roots, instead of the usual two roots found in this dental class among hominins.
According to Bailey and her colleagues, this dental characteristic is particularly common among contemporary Asian populations, up to 40 % in comparison to less than 3.5 % in non-Asian populations, therefore they conclude that modern Asian populations have inherited this feature from the Denisovans as a result of the hybridisation of their ancestors with this extinct population.
The study that has just been published by the paleoanthropologist María Martinón-Torres, together with two other dental specialists, Richard Scott, from the University of Reno (USA) and Joel Irish, from the University of Liverpool (UK), refutes this conclusion.
On one hand, the high frequencies of molars with three roots in Asian populations refers to the first molar, not the second. Even in the groups with the highest frequency of molars with three roots in the world, the Aletus, this feature is present in 40.7 % of first molars but only 1.9 % in second molars. Therefore, the comparison of the frequencies of the Xiahe feature with modern populations would be based on the “wrong tooth”.
On the other hand, the detailed morphological study of the Denisovan molar from Xiahe reveals that, although they have three roots, their configuration is different than it is in modern human populations and tends to be more frequent among Asians. The third root is not only different with regards to its size and shape, but also its position. In other words, the genetic variation that caused it to develop three roots in Xiahe is probably different to that which caused molars with three roots in modern populations, predominantly from Asia.
“They are similar in appearance only, they are different features”, states María Martinón. The researcher, who led the Dental Anthropology Group at the Cenieh for eight years, notes: “Although teeth are the best tool that we have for studying species that are extinct, we must be very careful and not overreach with interpretations of isolated features. To speak of introgression between species because of one common characteristic, which is not even the case here, is very risky”, she concludes.