From Plate to BrainMicroplastics in the Brain: New Studies Link Ultra-Processed Foods to Mental Health Risks
Source:
Genomic Press
4 min Reading Time
New research in Brain Medicine explores how microplastics from ultra-processed foods may accumulate in the brain — and raises urgent questions about their possible role in depression, dementia, and other mental health disorders.
Research has revealed that the human brain contains approximately “a spoon's worth” of microplastics and nanoplastics, with particularly high concentrations (3-5 times greater) in individuals with dementia.
(Source: Genomic Press)
A groundbreaking collection of four papers published in the May issue of Brain Medicine synthesizes mounting evidence that microplastics from ultra-processed foods may be accumulating in human brains and potentially contributing to the rising global rates of depression, dementia, and other mental health disorders. The papers provide the most comprehensive analysis to date of how these tiny plastic particles might be affecting brain health through multiple interconnected biological pathways.
The Plastic Spoon in Your Brain
The striking cover of Brain Medicine's May 2025 issue depicts a human brain stippled with colorful microplastic particles alongside a plastic spoon — a visual that powerfully captures the main finding that human brains contain approximately “a spoonful” of microplastic material. This alarming concept is examined in depth across all four articles in this special collection, including a peer-reviewed commentary previously published online titled “Human microplastic removal: what does the evidence tell us?” that appeared in the May issue alongside three new papers.
The featured peer-reviewed viewpoint article by Dr. Nicholas Fabiano from the University of Ottawa, Dr. Brandon Luu from the University of Toronto, Dr. David Puder from Loma Linda University School of Medicine, and Dr. Wolfgang Marx from Deakin University’s Food & Mood Centre, titled “Microplastics and mental health: The role of ultra-processed foods”, builds upon their earlier commentary on microplastic accumulation in human tissue, “Human microplastic removal: what does the evidence tell us?”. This new viewpoint paper synthesizes emerging evidence to propose a novel hypothesis connecting ultra-processed food consumption, microplastic exposure, and mental health outcomes.
“We’re seeing converging evidence that should concern us all,” explains Dr. Fabiano. “Ultra-processed foods now comprise more than 50 % of energy intake in countries like the United States, and these foods contain significantly higher concentrations of microplastics than whole foods. Recent findings show these particles can cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in alarming quantities.”
The Mental Health Connection
The researchers cite substantial evidence linking ultra-processed food consumption with adverse mental health outcomes. A recent umbrella review published in The BMJ found that people who consumed ultra-processed foods had a 22 % higher risk of depression, 48 % higher risk of anxiety, and 41 % higher risk of poor sleep outcomes.
What makes their hypothesis particularly compelling is the novel suggestion that microplastics — tiny plastic particles less than 5 mm in size — may be a missing link in this relationship. The researchers point to disturbing data showing that foods like chicken nuggets contain 30 times more microplastics per gram than chicken breasts, highlighting the impact of industrial processing.
The hypothesis gains further credibility from recent findings published in Nature Medicine that demonstrated alarming microplastic concentrations in the human brain — approximately “a spoon's worth” according to the researchers — with levels three to five times higher in those with documented dementia diagnoses.
Shared Mechanisms of Harm
“This hypothesis is particularly compelling because we see remarkable overlap in biological mechanisms,” notes Dr. Marx. “Ultra-processed foods have been linked to adverse mental health through inflammation, oxidative stress, epigenetics, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disruptions to neurotransmitter systems. Microplastics appear to operate through remarkably similar pathways.”
The viewpoint article raises an intriguing question: Could the microplastic content of ultra-processed foods be partially responsible for their observed negative mental health effects? To study this relationship more systematically, the authors propose the development of a Dietary Microplastic Index (DMI) to quantify exposure through food consumption.
Possible Removal Pathways
Complementing the viewpoint article is a peer-reviewed Brevia research paper titled “Therapeutic apheresis: A promising method to remove microplastics?” by Dr. Stefan Bornstein and colleagues. This paper, also published in the May issue, examines preliminary evidence that extracorporeal therapeutic apheresis — a technique that filters blood outside the body — may have the potential to remove microplastic particles from human circulation.
Date: 08.12.2025
Naturally, we always handle your personal data responsibly. Any personal data we receive from you is processed in accordance with applicable data protection legislation. For detailed information please see our privacy policy.
Consent to the use of data for promotional purposes
I hereby consent to Vogel Communications Group GmbH & Co. KG, Max-Planck-Str. 7-9, 97082 Würzburg including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG (hereafter: Vogel Communications Group) using my e-mail address to send editorial newsletters. A list of all affiliated companies can be found here
Newsletter content may include all products and services of any companies mentioned above, including for example specialist journals and books, events and fairs as well as event-related products and services, print and digital media offers and services such as additional (editorial) newsletters, raffles, lead campaigns, market research both online and offline, specialist webportals and e-learning offers. In case my personal telephone number has also been collected, it may be used for offers of aforementioned products, for services of the companies mentioned above, and market research purposes.
Additionally, my consent also includes the processing of my email address and telephone number for data matching for marketing purposes with select advertising partners such as LinkedIn, Google, and Meta. For this, Vogel Communications Group may transmit said data in hashed form to the advertising partners who then use said data to determine whether I am also a member of the mentioned advertising partner portals. Vogel Communications Group uses this feature for the purposes of re-targeting (up-selling, cross-selling, and customer loyalty), generating so-called look-alike audiences for acquisition of new customers, and as basis for exclusion for on-going advertising campaigns. Further information can be found in section “data matching for marketing purposes”.
In case I access protected data on Internet portals of Vogel Communications Group including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG, I need to provide further data in order to register for the access to such content. In return for this free access to editorial content, my data may be used in accordance with this consent for the purposes stated here. This does not apply to data matching for marketing purposes.
Right of revocation
I understand that I can revoke my consent at will. My revocation does not change the lawfulness of data processing that was conducted based on my consent leading up to my revocation. One option to declare my revocation is to use the contact form found at https://contact.vogel.de. In case I no longer wish to receive certain newsletters, I have subscribed to, I can also click on the unsubscribe link included at the end of a newsletter. Further information regarding my right of revocation and the implementation of it as well as the consequences of my revocation can be found in the data protection declaration, section editorial newsletter.
“While we need to reduce our exposure to microplastics through better food choices and packaging alternatives, we also need research into how to remove these particles from the human body,” notes Dr. Bornstein. “Our early findings suggest that apheresis might offer one possible pathway for microplastic removal, though much more research is needed.”
“What emerges from this work is not a warning. It is a reckoning,” writes Dr. Wong. “The boundary between internal and external has failed. If microplastics cross the blood-brain barrier, what else do we think remains sacred?”
The authors of all four papers emphasize that while more primary research is needed, their analyses add another dimension to the growing case for reducing ultra-processed food consumption and developing better methods to detect and potentially remove microplastics from the human body.
“As the levels of ultra-processed foods, microplastics, and adverse mental health outcomes simultaneously rise, it is imperative that we further investigate this potential association,” concludes Dr. Fabiano. “After all, you are what you eat.”
Original Article: Una cuchara de plástico en tu cerebro: The calamity of a plastic spoon in your brain; Brain Medicine; DOI:10.61373/bm025g.0062