When it comes to our most important long-term goals in life, it is not uncommon to face obstacles that may lead us to doubt whether we can achieve our ambitions. But when life hands you doubts, the answer may be to question your doubts, a new study suggests.
Research from Ohio State shows that inducing “doubt in one’s doubts” can strengthen commitment to personal goals rather than weaken it.
A psychology professor found that when people who were worried about achieving an identity goal were induced to experience what is called meta-cognitive doubt, they actually became more committed to achieving their goal. “What this study found is that inducing doubts in one’s doubts can provide a formula for confidence,” said Patrick Carroll, author of the study and professor of psychology at The Ohio State University at Lima.
Carroll was interested in what happens when people have what is called an “action crisis” while pursuing an identity goal — a long-term objective centered on who you want to become in life. Wanting to become a doctor, for instance, is an identity goal. An action crisis is a decision conflict where you are not sure if you want to continue pursuit of the goal.
“When you’re pursing identity goals, bumps in the roads inevitably arise. There may come a point where the obstacle is big enough to evoke doubts about whether to continue,” Carroll said. Most research on the topic has focused specifically on these doubts and how they can impact whether people go forward with their goals. But based on previous work done by other Ohio State researchers, Carroll decided to examine meta-cognitive doubt, which is the sense of certainty a person has in the validity of one’s thoughts.
In the case of this research, a person can have doubts about whether they can achieve their goal. But what happens if you make the person wonder if their doubts are valid? Carroll conducted two studies. One involved 267 people who participated online. First, they completed an action crisis scale about their most important personal goal. The scale included items such as “I doubt whether I should continue striving for my goal or disengage from it” and participants responded on a scale from “strongly disagree” to strongly agree.”
Participants were then told they would take part in a second, unrelated study on the effect of memory writing exercises. Half of the participants were asked to write about a time that they felt confidence in their thinking. The other half were asked to write about a time when they had experienced doubt in their thinking.
After completing the writing exercise, all participants were asked to rate how committed they were to achieving their most important personal goal, on a scale from “not at all committed” to “very committed.”
Findings showed that the writing exercise succeeded in making people feel more confident or more doubtful in their own thoughts about their identity goal — even though the writing exercise was not directly connected to their goals.
Here’s how it worked: Those participants who felt doubtful about their identity goal — and then wrote about an experience feeling confident — were less committed to achieving their goal. In other words, the writing exercise made them more confident in their doubts about achieving their goal.
On the other hand, those who felt doubtful about their goal and then wrote about an experience of feeling doubtful in their own thoughts actually had higher levels of commitment to their goals. For them, writing about doubt made them question their own doubts about achieving their goal. “On some level, it may seem that doubt would be additive. Doubt plus doubt would equal more doubt,” Carroll said. “But this study found the opposite: Doubt plus doubt equaled less doubt.”
Carroll replicated the findings in another study, involving 130 college students, that used a different way of inducing doubt. In this study, Carroll used a technique developed by Ohio State researchers that had the participants complete the action crisis scale with their non-dominant hand.
“Previous research showed that using the non-dominant hand leads participants to have doubts in their own thoughts because they use their shaky handwriting as a cue that their thoughts must be invalid,” Carroll said. “And that is exactly what I found in this study. So in two different studies we found that inducing meta-cognitive doubt can lead to people doubting their own doubts.”
Date: 08.12.2025
Naturally, we always handle your personal data responsibly. Any personal data we receive from you is processed in accordance with applicable data protection legislation. For detailed information please see our privacy policy.
Consent to the use of data for promotional purposes
I hereby consent to Vogel Communications Group GmbH & Co. KG, Max-Planck-Str. 7-9, 97082 Würzburg including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG (hereafter: Vogel Communications Group) using my e-mail address to send editorial newsletters. A list of all affiliated companies can be found here
Newsletter content may include all products and services of any companies mentioned above, including for example specialist journals and books, events and fairs as well as event-related products and services, print and digital media offers and services such as additional (editorial) newsletters, raffles, lead campaigns, market research both online and offline, specialist webportals and e-learning offers. In case my personal telephone number has also been collected, it may be used for offers of aforementioned products, for services of the companies mentioned above, and market research purposes.
Additionally, my consent also includes the processing of my email address and telephone number for data matching for marketing purposes with select advertising partners such as LinkedIn, Google, and Meta. For this, Vogel Communications Group may transmit said data in hashed form to the advertising partners who then use said data to determine whether I am also a member of the mentioned advertising partner portals. Vogel Communications Group uses this feature for the purposes of re-targeting (up-selling, cross-selling, and customer loyalty), generating so-called look-alike audiences for acquisition of new customers, and as basis for exclusion for on-going advertising campaigns. Further information can be found in section “data matching for marketing purposes”.
In case I access protected data on Internet portals of Vogel Communications Group including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG, I need to provide further data in order to register for the access to such content. In return for this free access to editorial content, my data may be used in accordance with this consent for the purposes stated here. This does not apply to data matching for marketing purposes.
Right of revocation
I understand that I can revoke my consent at will. My revocation does not change the lawfulness of data processing that was conducted based on my consent leading up to my revocation. One option to declare my revocation is to use the contact form found at https://contact.vogel.de. In case I no longer wish to receive certain newsletters, I have subscribed to, I can also click on the unsubscribe link included at the end of a newsletter. Further information regarding my right of revocation and the implementation of it as well as the consequences of my revocation can be found in the data protection declaration, section editorial newsletter.
On a practical level, it may be difficult for individuals to induce doubts about their doubts on their own, Carroll said. One reason it worked in this study is that participants were not aware that the doubt induction was related to their goal doubts.
This could be more effective if someone else — a therapist, a teacher, a friend or a parent — can help a person question their own thoughts and doubts. “You don’t want the person to be aware that you’re getting them to question their doubts about their goals,” he said. Carroll also noted that this technique should be used carefully, because it could potentially undermine wise judgment if overused or misapplied. “You don’t want to undermine humility and replace it with overconfidence or premature certainty,” he said. “This needs to be used wisely.”
Original Article: Increasing identity goal commitment by inducing doubt in goal doubts; Self and Identity; DOI:10.1080/15298868.2025.2597804