Australia: Marine Biology Fact-Check Reveals: Fish Are Less Affected by Ocean Acidification than Expected
Over the last decade, several high-profile scientific studies have reported that tropical fish living in coral reefs are adversely affected by ocean acidification caused by climate change. But now new research suggests that isn't the case.
Montréal/Canada — Researchers have claimed that fish living in coral reefs behave oddly and are attracted to predators as levels of carbon dioxide dissolved from air pollution increase. In the most exhaustive study yet of the impacts of ocean acidification on the behaviour of coral reef fish, headed up in Australia and co-authored by two Université de Montréal researchers, it turns out fish behaviour is not affected at all.
When they tried to re-do those earlier studies with many of the same species, and by crunching the data in a new analysis, Timothy Clark, an associate professor at Deakin University's School of Life and Environmental Sciences in Geelong, and his team of Canadian and Scandinavian scientists — including Udem biologists Sandra Binning and Dominique Roche — arrived at very different results. It turns out the original results couldn’t be replicated.
'Consistently Normal Behaviours'
The scientists expected previous results would be easy to repeat because of how clear and strong they appeared in the initial papers. Instead, they found consistently normal behaviours in fish that they acclimated to (predicted) end-of-(21st)-century levels of CO2.
But "by using rigorous methods, measuring multiple behaviours in multiple species, and making our data and analysis code openly available, we have comprehensively and transparently shown that ... ocean acidification has negligible direct impacts on the behaviour of fish on coral reefs,” said Clark. Specifically, elevated CO2 would not meaningfully alter activity levels or behavioural lateralization (left-right turning preference), nor would it alter the response of fish to the chemical cues released by predators.
The new study is bound to make a big impact in the marine biology world, the scientists believe. Not only does it contradict earlier studies, it shows that science doesn't always produce results to buttress things everyone agrees on, like climate change.
"Some people may be surprised by these findings, but that's how science operates: it’s a normal and healthy process to question published results. Sometimes they hold up, and sometimes they don’t. Ultimately, it’s the accumulation of evidence that matters and brings us closer to the truth," said Binning, an assistant professor at Udem. "We're not saying that climate change is not a problem — far from it," added Roche, her husband, a research associate at Udem. "Our point is that replication studies are very important, just as are ocean acidification and global warming generally."
Clark emphasizes that the negative effects of CO2 emissions are well established, with global warming already having devastating effects on coral reef ecosystems around the world. Among other things, more frequent storms and coral bleaching during heatwaves would be causing severe habitat loss for fish. “So, despite our new results, coral reefs and their fish communities remain in grave danger because of increasing atmospheric CO2."
Focus attention elsewhere
Now, instead of concentrating on how fish behaviour is affected by ocean acidification, scientists would do better to focus their attention "on others aspects of climate change that are more in need of research," such as infectious disease risk, habitat destruction, and decreased oxygen levels in water, said Binning, holder of a Canada Research Chair on Eco-Evolution and Host-Parasite Interactions.
"With so little time left to combat climate change, it’s vitally important that research dollars are used in the best way possible to better help us understand and target systems and organisms at the greatest risk,” added Roche.
Reference: "Ocean acidification does not impair the behaviour of coral reef fishes," by Timothy D. Clark et al, was published Jan. 8, 2020, in Nature.
This article is protected by copyright. You want to use it for your own purpose? Contact us at support.vogel.de (ID: 46305307)