Wealth Gaps Perception and Its Impact on Taxation Attitudes

Sociology Seeing the Rich Boosts Demand for Redistribution

2025-11-27 Source: The London School of Economics and Political Science 1 min Reading Time

Related Vendor

What people notice about wealth gaps strongly shapes their attitudes toward taxation. Experiments reveal that when poor participants see the rich, they favor more redistribution but become more dissatisfied, highlighting a trade-off between awareness and social conflict.

Visibility of inequality drives tax preferences, but also fuels dissatisfaction.(Source: free licensed / Pixabay) — Visibility of inequality drives tax preferences, but also fuels dissatisfaction.
(Source: free licensed / Pixabay)

If people do not observe inequality, they are less likely to favor policies that redistribute wealth, such as taxation — but they are also more satisfied with their lot, according to online experiments involving 1440 US-based participants. Milena Tsvetkova and colleagues developed a model simulating how network structure affects perception of inequality and tested its predictions through an online experiment where participants voted on tax rates. In the experiment, participants were randomly assigned as “rich” (with scores around 200) or “poor” (with scores around 20) and could observe only eight of the 24 total group members, with different network structures determining who they observed.

Sample of the screen seen by study participants in the second round of the online experiment. (Source: Tsvetkova et al.) — Sample of the screen seen by study participants in the second round of the online experiment.
(Source: Tsvetkova et al.)

Although all participants were informed in advance about the possible range of scores, the authors found that segregated networks — where rich observe only rich and poor observe only poor — produced the lowest redistribution via taxes and lowest polarization, keeping poor participants poorest but satisfied. Networks where poor participants could see many rich participants generated higher redistribution via taxes but also increased polarization and dissatisfaction. The rich participants rarely increased their support for redistribution regardless of network structure, while poor participants became more supportive when observing the benefits of higher taxation over repeated rounds.

According to the authors, political communication strategies aiming to increase support for redistribution should enhance visibility of excessive wealth through news reports, political discourse, and social media — though this risks exacerbating polarization and conflict.

Original Article: Social networks affect redistribution decisions and polarization

(ID:50641798)

Subscribe to the newsletter now

Don't Miss out on Our Best Content

Business E-mail

Please enter a valid mailadress.

By clicking on „Subscribe to Newsletter“ I agree to the processing and use of my data according to the consent form (please expand for details) and accept the Terms of Use. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy. The consent declaration relates, among other things, to the sending of editorial newsletters by email and to data matching for marketing purposes with selected advertising partners (e.g., LinkedIn, Google, Meta)

Date: 08.12.2025

Naturally, we always handle your personal data responsibly. Any personal data we receive from you is processed in accordance with applicable data protection legislation. For detailed information please see our privacy policy.

Consent to the use of data for promotional purposes

I hereby consent to Vogel Communications Group GmbH & Co. KG, Max-Planck-Str. 7-9, 97082 Würzburg including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG (hereafter: Vogel Communications Group) using my e-mail address to send editorial newsletters. A list of all affiliated companies can be found here

Newsletter content may include all products and services of any companies mentioned above, including for example specialist journals and books, events and fairs as well as event-related products and services, print and digital media offers and services such as additional (editorial) newsletters, raffles, lead campaigns, market research both online and offline, specialist webportals and e-learning offers. In case my personal telephone number has also been collected, it may be used for offers of aforementioned products, for services of the companies mentioned above, and market research purposes.

Additionally, my consent also includes the processing of my email address and telephone number for data matching for marketing purposes with select advertising partners such as LinkedIn, Google, and Meta. For this, Vogel Communications Group may transmit said data in hashed form to the advertising partners who then use said data to determine whether I am also a member of the mentioned advertising partner portals. Vogel Communications Group uses this feature for the purposes of re-targeting (up-selling, cross-selling, and customer loyalty), generating so-called look-alike audiences for acquisition of new customers, and as basis for exclusion for on-going advertising campaigns. Further information can be found in section “data matching for marketing purposes”.

In case I access protected data on Internet portals of Vogel Communications Group including any affiliated companies according to §§ 15 et seq. AktG, I need to provide further data in order to register for the access to such content. In return for this free access to editorial content, my data may be used in accordance with this consent for the purposes stated here. This does not apply to data matching for marketing purposes.

Right of revocation

I understand that I can revoke my consent at will. My revocation does not change the lawfulness of data processing that was conducted based on my consent leading up to my revocation. One option to declare my revocation is to use the contact form found at https://contact.vogel.de. In case I no longer wish to receive certain newsletters, I have subscribed to, I can also click on the unsubscribe link included at the end of a newsletter. Further information regarding my right of revocation and the implementation of it as well as the consequences of my revocation can be found in the data protection declaration, section editorial newsletter.